RadioShack / Realistic DX-200 HF Receiver

  Add a review   View all reviews (1)   Add to my shack


Frequency range

0.15-30 MHz
HAM bands
Tuning steps

Find the RadioShack / Realistic DX-200 on ebay


AM   CW   SSB  
Receiver system
Image rejection
Audio output




50 Ω


Power requirements
Current drain RX


Dimensions (w×h×d)
Form factor
Between 1981 and 1983

Other features

Amateur / Ham radio operators
Features + options

Manuals, diagrams and brochures

No documents available for this rig

Can you supply additional documents? Please get in touch!
Show more RadioShack / Realistic documents...

Have you spotted an error or can you provide more information? Let us know!


Love Hate Radio.

RadioShack / Realistic DX-200, HF Receiver

Imagine your a 12 year old kid and its Christmas 1981. Their is no Internet to keep ya busy, and the best video games were the not to thrilling Atari 2600 vintage stuff. You read every library book you could get your hands on about ham radio, and shortwave, and dreamed someday to have something better than a modified AM radio you built to try and pick up shortwave. FLASH its Christmas morning 1981, and you get a big box under the tree. You open it up Christmas morning, and it's a REALISTIC DX 200 WOW there is A SANTA CLAUSE.. It was my dear Mother. She really tried to get me something nice. I would use that radio for a solid 2-3 years everyday 8-10-14 hours a day. I know this radios many features and faults by heart. FEATURES. 1. BFO to tune in ssb. 2. A noise blanker & crystal calibrator. 3. A oscillator to hook up a Morse code key 4. A real great looking radio had a great look 5. A main tuning dial & a fine tuning dial 6. A place to mute the radio so you could transmit and receive with this gem 7. A cool lighted meter & needle pretty accurate. 8. The audio was pretty good from its speaker 9. Dipole hookup & a gnd hook up. 10. Overall coolness factor a 7 out of 10 Faults. 1. Its tuning dial was not accurate or calibrated whatsoever or ever made to be accurate. you would calibrate it and then the other bands would be off. The tuning was stiff and was extremely hard to tune to a freq you wanted to hear. it was better to just tune a band and stop on stations by hunting and pouncing then trying to find a certain freq. 2. It was a drift monster. you had to be close to that radio within a few minutes it would be off frequency. i use to use it as a cw receiver and if you would bump the table the radio was on the freq went off hard to old a cw qso. 3.The radios inability to handle strong stations would swamp the front end, and make it hard to tune in stations to weak or to loud. 4.The radios look was very appealing its performance was like a moped on the Indy speedway. Way to underpowered to be a real useful receiver for a serious application. As a boy i was thrilled to own my very first shortwave, and it was a cool looking radio. But reality was this radio was a drifter, and not that sensitive, and was made from cheap clear plastic thrown into a black painted tin box which was like a dumb blond. Looks great just don't expect a lot of work from her or it will be a very big disappointment. So i loved this the best present i have ever got from anyone. Yet this radio was not the race horse you want or need on raceway, but just a show horse, which looks better than performs. Joe Leto W0IW

Written by W0IW on Dec 4, 2010

Build quality
User friendlyness
Value for money
Good condition in 1981
USD 75.00


Estimating the value of a rig can be challenging. The graph below shows historical prices paid by hams over the years. May it guide you to good fortune...

Price Condition Year User
USD 75.00 Good / New 1981 W0IW
USD 50.00 Good / Used 2016 k6alf
To submit a price, either review the rig or add it to your shack.