- Description
- The Milspec 1030 followed the Signal/One CX-7 and Signal/One CX-11 top-of-the-line transceivers made by Signal/One. The "introductory" price of the radio shown above was USD 5740.00. As its name and pricetag suggest, the Milspec 1030 was manufactured to unusually high quality standards.
Introduced in 1981, The Milspec 1030 was an effort to upstage the popular Collins KWM-380 transceiver with a second-generation synthesizer design.
The Milspec 1030's front panel clearly resembles that of the KWM-380, with front-mounted speaker, meter, button, knob and display layouts closely mimicing the Collins styling. The large black power toggle switch is identical to that used in the Collins.
Type- Desktop Amateur HF Transceiver
- Frequency range RX
- 10 kHz - 30 MHz
- TX
- 1.6-30 MHz
- Modulations RX
- AM / CW / USB / LSB / AFSK
- TX
- CW / USB / LSB / AFSK
- Frequency stability
- 1 ppm/month, 1 Hz/°C after 15 min. warm-up at 25°C typical
- Tuning steps
- Sensitivity
- 0.25 µV (-118 dBm or better) for 10 dB S:N
- Selectivity
- Filters
- Receiver system
- Double conversion
- IF-frequencies
- 1st: 40.455 MHz
2nd: 455 kHz - Image rejection
- 80 dB
- Aerial
- 50 Ω, SO-239
- RF-output
- 150 W (200 W high power option)
- Audio output
- Memories
- 9 channels in 1 banks
- Power requirements
- 12-15V DC or mains
- Current drain RX
- TX
- Max 40 A
- Manufactured
- Between 1981 and 1984 in USA
- Dimensions (w×h×d)
- 412 × 198 × 452 mm (16.22 × 7.80 × 17.80 in)
- Weight
- 22.7 kg (50.1 lbs)
- Features
- Dual VFO. Full QSK Computer control
- Files
- -
Price History
Estimating the value of a rig, especially an old one, can be challenging. The graph below displays what others have paid for this rig over the years. May it guide you to good fortune...
|
|
Link to this image:
|
|
|
|
Videos
Videos are automatically fetched from YouTube. Not all rigs have matching videos.
View more videos about the Signal/One Milspec 1030 on YouTube.
View more videos about the Signal/One Milspec 1030 on YouTube.
| Signal/One Milspec 1030 ratings | |
| Build quality |  |
| Features | |
| Ergonomics | |
| Value for money | |
| Overall | |
|
Based on 0 reviews
|
|
